Table of Contents
I would certainly include Toyota 2/3TC motor is someplace in the leading three yet with those domestics you definitely have my top four of perpetuity for dependability. Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine problem. Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I question exactly how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own means ... the 300i6 would certainly do whatever I need this truck to do patgizz created: 3 things in the auto globe refuse to damage.
those should be held as the standard to which every little thing else is determined. regrettably, virtually everything else pales in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 certainly) Wow, due to the outpour of appreciation, it looked good so I bought it, here's the ad lmk what you people think Oops, didn't mean to be cryptic, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm rather huge, and the steering wheel to seat is fairly narrow ... male that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only problem I've ever before seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little also tough and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage will not be the very best in the globe, yet it will certainly damn sure run for life. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had lots of room in the cab of them. wbjones composed: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply sounded like a diesel. I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time obtaining out of it's own means ... The engine bay wasn't designed for anything longer than a Mod motor. One Canister get rid of an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, but it draws.
WonkoTheSane composed: spitfirebill created: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he say to necessitate this? I'm truly interested. I didn't see anything in his reply that would certainly need this feedback. "They are typically dependable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled created: wbjones created: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Corrosion is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just sounded like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 highway with the OD5. I question just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I really did not make clear ... my poor In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor since when I had to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to discover one that wasn't sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to chat regarding a few concerns of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to come out and claim one is much better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the exact same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Allow's talk concerning engine and actually simply to define that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have been around for a lengthy time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around given that, you know, around that time too. We're not going to get back right into, into the earlier things. Considering that 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more preferred and I wouldn't truly suggest a V6 engine.
There's a great deal of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which caused troubles.
Really really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't explain ... my poor In respond to spitfirebill: I added that factor because when I needed to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to discover one that wasn't sludged up really terribly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to speak regarding a couple of issues of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same vehicle.
They seem to be a little bit extra made use of because area, yet, you recognize, those are a few of the usages, however they're basically the exact same classification of vehicle. Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these 2 lorries? Bernie: Yeah. Allow's speak concerning engine and in fact simply to specify that the version years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a lengthy time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you understand, around that time also. So we're not going to obtain back right into, into the earlier things. Since 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot a lot more preferred and I wouldn't really suggest a V6 engine.
There's a lot of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with impact to these engines, since they really did not have sufficient threading in the spark plug, which caused issues.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer near me St. Petersburg
Ford F150 dealer

